Federer vs Zverev Highlights (HQ) QF Rome Masters 2009
Posted by admin
Roger Federer beat Mishca Zverev 7-6(3) 6-1 to reach Semi Final against Novak Djokovic
Duration : 0:3:14
25 Responses to “Federer vs Zverev Highlights (HQ) QF Rome Masters 2009”
Leave a Reply
May 19th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
For a …
For a serve-and-volleyer, Zverev has real good touch on the baseline!
May 19th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
He is getting …
He is getting better on clay..lets see in roland garros
May 19th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
yes nadal is his so …
yes nadal is his so called prime and for how long is still uncertain but rest assured that he will also fade as federer has…lol!
May 19th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
nadal who?????ah… …
nadal who?????ah…the one trailing behind federer for almost five years as world nos 2 and fortunately got his shot at being the current nos 1??hopefully he will last long as federer does and some new dudes wont get his smelly ass!lol!
May 19th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
Nadal es un …
Nadal es un pasabolas, es un perdedor.
When he doesnt have his muscular legs and his muscular arms, he will be a looser.
VAMOS ROGER
May 19th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
yes yes..
clay: …
yes yes..
clay: nadal 9-1 Federer
Grass:Federer 2-1 Nadal
Hard:Federer 3-3 Nadal
That’s all, he dominates him in clay, in the other surfaces no.
And Federer loose in Australia because he isn’t the same that in the years 2004,2005,2006 and 20007
May 19th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
If federer can …
If federer can concentrate and keep his game goin he might pull a surprise at the french open.
May 19th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
The match score was …
The match score was 7-6 6-2, not 7-6 6-1. Thanks.
May 19th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
asdasdasdasd
asdasdasdasd
May 19th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
Bye.
Bye.
May 19th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
GOOD comeback.
GOOD comeback.
May 19th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
What are you still …
What are you still doing here? This isn’t a Nadal vid. Troll elsewhere.
May 19th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
LMAO, …
LMAO, simultaneously holding the AUS, FRENCH, and WIMBLY!! Meaning he holds all three crowns at once, what don’t you understand dude?!
May 19th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
I’m sure you’re …
I’m sure you’re referring to this “Nadal is the only player in history to hold a slam on clay, grass, and hard simultaneously. ”
Simultaneously as in he won 2, lost one, then the next year he won one.
Simultaneously: existing or occurring at the same time : exactly coincident.
May 19th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
WRONG AGAIN: I …
WRONG AGAIN: I clearly said in one of my earlier comments that Nadal is the first to hold majors SIMULTANEOUSLY on 3 separate surfaces!! Now please give it up man, you are not gonna win this argument. Obviously!!
May 19th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
WRONG. Agassi won …
WRONG. Agassi won Wimbledon in 1992, the U.S. Open in 1994, and the French Open in 1999.
Perhaps in some Fantasy land you will eventually be right. Until then
May 19th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
Roger Federer lost …
Roger Federer lost today against Djokovic at the semi- finals in Rome Masters 2009. Nadal for sure is going to win the Rome Masters 2009. this is my perdition and stop putting thumbs down on my comments.
May 19th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
WRONG, when they …
WRONG, when they won their titles they were one on grass and clay!! 3 of the 4 surfaces in the majors were played on Grass. Nice try though!!
May 19th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
True!
True!
May 19th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
The AUS and the US …
The AUS and the US open were fairly different, but I would agree right now the Rebound surface is similiar to the Decoturf. However it’s generally agreed that the Us open courts are now the fastest of the slams, seeing as how the grass at Wimbledon has gotten slower.
As for 3 different surfaces winning slams, Nadal is not the only player in history to have done that. In fact Budge and Laver not only won slams on all 3 surfaces, but they won all 4 grand slams in the same year.
May 19th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
Check Rod Laver!
Check Rod Laver!
May 19th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
Federer never held …
Federer never held a major on 3 different surfaces, technically both the AUS and the US are played on hardcourts despite the differences in bounce and conditions. Nadal is the only player in history to hold a slam on clay, grass, and hard simultaneously.
May 19th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
True. I think he …
True. I think he loses on purpose these days because he’s afraid of confronting Nadal at a later stage and risking another debacle. He might have to cange the girlfriend to get some more selfconfidence. I would if I was him.
May 19th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
Fuck that…fuck …
that…fuck Federer,it’s enough…i can’t believe that shit…Federer doesn’t have the ability to close matches,it’s a fact!5 min ago he lost to Djokovic after he had 6-4,3-1 in second and 3-1 in the third set…it’s unbelieveble, he lost 6-4 3-6 3-6.Federer’s game is like 2 years ago,he didn’t drop anything,but his confidence is 0!
May 19th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
mugs are for fags.. …
mugs are for fags..
-____-